Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:M61 Vulcan: Difference between revisions
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
**Ahem cough cough, M61 Vulcans exist in the armories of Hollywood Gun rental houses, so yes it is appropriate. ;) MPM | **Ahem cough cough, M61 Vulcans exist in the armories of Hollywood Gun rental houses, so yes it is appropriate. ;) MPM | ||
: - Really? That's just wicked. :D [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 01:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:36, 5 May 2010
Appropriate for this site?
I am afraid I have to question whether or not this weapon is appropriate for inclusion into this site. So far as I know, this weapon does not have a manually-fired version, which is one of the primary criteria for a weapon's inclusion. Some other large-caliber vehicle-mounted weapons (M242 Bushmaster chaingun, BGM-71 TOW) are on the site, but those weapons qualify since they have manually-fired versions. If we allow this weapon, then we could easily end up with other weapons such as tank guns or howitzers flooding the site. Orca1 9904 23:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
There already are tank guns and howitzers on this site. :)
A manual version is seen in the video game Metal Gear Solid, which is listed on the page.
There is a towed variation of this gun. Limited to 3000rpm.
- Ahem cough cough, M61 Vulcans exist in the armories of Hollywood Gun rental houses, so yes it is appropriate. ;) MPM
- - Really? That's just wicked. :D StanTheMan 01:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)