| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Assembly: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
S&Wshooter (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:The Lend-Lease program? I know we made Mosins for them for a little while, so why not give them Enfields too?-[[User:S&Wshooter|S&Wshooter]] 21:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | :The Lend-Lease program? I know we made Mosins for them for a little while, so why not give them Enfields too?-[[User:S&Wshooter|S&Wshooter]] 21:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, probably. It seems weird they would arm Chinese Army soldiers disguised as ROK soldiers with Enfields though.--[[User:Oliveira|Oliveira]] 14:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:52, 5 November 2009
Sub machine guns
The M1A1 Thompson is an M1921 or M1928 not an M1A1. Note how it has the flash hider and the Charging handle is on top of the gun not the right side. That PPS-43 also looks more like a Carl Gustav sub machine gun to me.--Oliveira 16:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- You are probably right on the first point, but this disproves your second:
Note that the PPS has a curved magazine, a barrel with more ventilation holes and an underfolding stock when compared to a Carl Gustav. --Markit 16:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah. I was wrong about the PPS. Sorry about that. Also, where would Communist troops get M1917 Enfields?--Oliveira 18:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- The Lend-Lease program? I know we made Mosins for them for a little while, so why not give them Enfields too?-S&Wshooter 21:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, probably. It seems weird they would arm Chinese Army soldiers disguised as ROK soldiers with Enfields though.--Oliveira 14:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)