Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Hangover Part III: Difference between revisions
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Hangover Part III, The to Talk:The Hangover Part III: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
|
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 21:17, 28 July 2023
Discussion
Screenshots, please. TitaniumAlloy (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2013 (EDT)
- Won't be on disc for a while as it's only been in theaters for a week.--Crazycrankle (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2013 (EDT)
Complete
There, that should do it. I overwrote those previous bootleg screencaps with better quality images. The page was missing a few guns also, so I put them up there. Ps. This film really surprised me, after I watched it with lowered expectations after the pretty bad second one... --Warejaws (talk) 16:59, 9 October 2013 (EDT)
Jericho variant
I think this may be a semi-compact rather than a compact model. In the second image you can see the bottom of the grip protruding beneath his hand, which I don not think would happe if it was being held in a typical pair of male hands. Also, even if it was a compact it would be the RB and not the FB, as it has a slide mounted safety (which is on safe in both shots), so if it is a semi-compact it is an RS:
--commando552 (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2013 (EDT)
Henchman's USP
It might just be me, but given that this gun has front slide serrations, I'm less inclined to think it's a USP and more inclined to think it's a P2000. Thoughts? --Mormonpowerranger521 3:03, 28 January 2014 MST