Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Ransom (1996): Difference between revisions
m (Pyramid Silent moved page Talk:Ransom to Talk:Ransom (1996)) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
-And in the picture above the gun does not have the removable barrel bushing that 659s have. | -And in the picture above the gun does not have the removable barrel bushing that 659s have. | ||
:For years, the page has said that the gun is a 5943, but the barrel looks too long. The gun may seem like a 5943 based on size, but I think that is just because Delroy Lindo is a big guy with big hands. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008|talk]]) 16:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 2 October 2022
Pointless comments
Someone needs to take a little look see on this page, the anachronisms comments have gotten a little out of hand. There are also a couple of obvious mistakes.
FBI 10MM Debate
I've moved these from the main page. Not only are these comments a little silly, they were posted in the wrong place. --Jackie.45Cal 12:08, 6 April 2011 (CDT)
Correction - the FBI tested but never adopted the 10MM. (g. wood)
(In 1990 the FBI certainly did adopt the 10mm in the model SW 1076 decocker only pistol)
Smith Auto
I did the same thing here. --Jackie.45Cal 12:11, 6 April 2011 (CDT)
I think this is actually a Smith & Wesson 5946 because the gun does not appear to have a decocker. The 5946 is authorised by the NYPD but maby not for the FBI.
-And in the picture above the gun does not have the removable barrel bushing that 659s have.