| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:GoldenEye (1995): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AdAstra2009 (talk | contribs) m (→Makarov PM) |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:Do you have a good screencap of Natalia showing Bond that she knows how to use the Makarov (where she ejects the mag, slaps it back in, and then rakes the slide)? -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 02:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | :Do you have a good screencap of Natalia showing Bond that she knows how to use the Makarov (where she ejects the mag, slaps it back in, and then rakes the slide)? -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 02:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I'd take one but I just returned the DVD to the Library. Next time I head to the Library I'll borrow it and take the screencap. --[[ | ::I'd take one but I just returned the DVD to the Library. Next time I head to the Library I'll borrow it and take the screencap. --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 03:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:08, 2 July 2009
This seems rather odd - if the film's armorers could get their hands on genuine AK-74 rifles (and AKS-74Us), why would they need to use other weapons made to look like AK-74s?-MT2008 02:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- The reason why they don't use all AK-74s is economics. As an Armorer, I don't buy 20 or 30 of the newest or latest gun. The economics are not feasible since they will never rent enough to pay for themselves ever. Also the AK-74 lookalikes were real 5.45x39mm build up guns from parts kits and imported 5.45 receivers (and registered as Post-86 dealer samples) but only a few were made (at least in the U.S.). Now that parts kits have all but dried up due to ATF's ban we won't be seeing American Movie armorers getting (or building) any more of the latest Kalashnikov variants any time soon. MoviePropMaster2008 02:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- But what I mean is, if you DID have some real AK-74s already, wouldn't you make heavier use of them, and relegate the "fake" AK-74s to background characters only? That's the case in this film - they obviously do have SOME real AK-74s, yet they don't seem to use them very much. Instead, they use the Type 56s for many scenes, including uses of "hero" guns. Also, Bapty supplied the weapons for this film; dunno if that makes a difference. -MT2008 02:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- I see your point, but unfortunately, most directors and DPs can't tell the difference (believe me, when I've tried to point out the diff to them on set, they look at me like I'm a martian.) But also sometimes the best shots for editing reaction shots will end up being the guys with the chinese guns. By the time it gets to editing, the editor doesn't give a rat's ass about gusn (we all know about gun continuity errors, most of it is because most editors don't know guns). I know the film was done in England, but I just used the U.S. version as background into the how they would not have all AK74s. And say you spent the money and bought FOUR AK74s, it would simply take too much time to swap them around to be in the foreground. I know why they shot so many of the so called background guns. The reality is that director (not the armorer) didn't care. Hope that explains my point. :) Anyway, I've been on a lot of sets. The filming is fast and furious and if I tried to stop and make them swap the guns around, I'd be yelled at. Only the director (like one like Milius who cares about how a gun looks on camera) could arrange for that. I'm just defending the Bapty's guys, just to make sure that people don't think it's the armorer's fault. Anyway, just so we don't get everyone's panties in bunch ... we WILL move this to the discussion section in a litte bit. :) MoviePropMaster2008 06:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Of course, I do take your point that the armorer knows better than the director that Russian soldiers should have authentic AK-74s and not Type 56s made to look like them. I'd be kinda worried about any armorer who didn't. :) -MT2008 23:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Image Size
Okay, people need to stop changing the screencap size to 800px. That's too fucking big! 600px fills up some standard screen moniters completely, 800px veers off the screens! My computer doesn't but I've been on computers with screens that show this. So stop changing them back to 800px, the images are perfectly visible at 600px! - Gunmaster45
Moved from Main Article
- I correct myself, upon further examination I see the first gun is not even a Hi-Power, it is indeed a BDA MT2008. The confirming trait is the trigger guard, squared not rounded. Its sights are correct for the BDA and the slant as well.-RedJedRevolver
- I think I figured it out. In the first shot the pistol is a Norinco NZ-75, in the other two it is the BDM. They used a lot of Norinco firearms in the film, it wouldn't surprise me. And it is definately a BDM in the next two shots. I don't understand why you guys think it is a BDA, that's a compact .380 pistol that this barely looks like. - Gunmaster45
- He's not talking about the BDA .380, there is a full size BDA, and that it what was used in the first picture. And it is definitely not the Norinco.-RedJedRevolver
- Oh, my bad. But I still think it is a Norinco NZ-75, the slide cuts and designs are exact. - Gunmaster45
- Look at the Norinco, it has the slanted slide, however it also has a large cut/groove whatever you want to call it on the lower part of the slide below the barrel. That feature is absent in the picture.-RedJedRevolver
- Shit, you're right. I guess it is a BDA then. - Gunmaster45
- Hey it's fine, we all make mistakes, if you will move this to the talk page for future reference I'll get to work changing Section titles/pictures.
- Shit, you're right. I guess it is a BDA then. - Gunmaster45
- Look at the Norinco, it has the slanted slide, however it also has a large cut/groove whatever you want to call it on the lower part of the slide below the barrel. That feature is absent in the picture.-RedJedRevolver
- Oh, my bad. But I still think it is a Norinco NZ-75, the slide cuts and designs are exact. - Gunmaster45
- He's not talking about the BDA .380, there is a full size BDA, and that it what was used in the first picture. And it is definitely not the Norinco.-RedJedRevolver
- I think I figured it out. In the first shot the pistol is a Norinco NZ-75, in the other two it is the BDM. They used a lot of Norinco firearms in the film, it wouldn't surprise me. And it is definately a BDM in the next two shots. I don't understand why you guys think it is a BDA, that's a compact .380 pistol that this barely looks like. - Gunmaster45
Makarov PM
lol I just realized that every single screencap I took for the Makarov PM involves it being used to hold someone hostage. --AdAstra2009 02:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Do you have a good screencap of Natalia showing Bond that she knows how to use the Makarov (where she ejects the mag, slaps it back in, and then rakes the slide)? -MT2008 02:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'd take one but I just returned the DVD to the Library. Next time I head to the Library I'll borrow it and take the screencap. --AdAstra2009 03:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)