| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:State of Siege: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It is really strange gun, I tried to identify it for a long time but without success. Concerning MAS-38, it has a similarity but the bolt of MAS-38 recoils into the tube in the buttstock, so replacing the buttstock could make the gun unable to operate. Maybe this is a non-firing model of the SMG. I also have a guess that as the movie was filmed in Chile, this gun may be some Chilean domestic produced gun. Chilean gun manufacturer FAMAE acted from 19th century, possibly it produced some original weapons, but I couldn't find anything similar. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 02:45, 17 November 2020 (EST) | :It is really strange gun, I tried to identify it for a long time but without success. Concerning MAS-38, it has a similarity but the bolt of MAS-38 recoils into the tube in the buttstock, so replacing the buttstock could make the gun unable to operate. Maybe this is a non-firing model of the SMG. I also have a guess that as the movie was filmed in Chile, this gun may be some Chilean domestic produced gun. Chilean gun manufacturer FAMAE acted from 19th century, possibly it produced some original weapons, but I couldn't find anything similar. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 02:45, 17 November 2020 (EST) | ||
::While looking on this gun again, I begin to doubt if this is an SMG. The magazine may be thicker than the one for 9 Par or .45. Maybe a police riot gun or a magazine-fed shotgun? --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 05:02, 17 November 2020 (EST) | ::While looking on this gun again, I begin to doubt if this is an SMG. The magazine may be thicker than the one for 9 Par or .45. Maybe a police riot gun or a magazine-fed shotgun? --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 05:02, 17 November 2020 (EST) | ||
A bit of photoshop: | |||
[[File:Etat de siege-SMG-4PS.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
[[File:Etat de siege-SMG-5PS.jpg|thumb|none|500px|]] | |||
As far as I can see, the gun has a skeleton buttstock, as through it we can see the crease of the uniform. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 05:13, 17 November 2020 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 10:13, 17 November 2020
SMG looks strange. The buttstock is attached to the top (which in theory would block view the sights), and the barrel is too thin. Perhaps this is a MAS-38 with a new buttstock and forearm attached, although the reason for such changes is not clear. --Slon95 (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2020 (EST)
- It is really strange gun, I tried to identify it for a long time but without success. Concerning MAS-38, it has a similarity but the bolt of MAS-38 recoils into the tube in the buttstock, so replacing the buttstock could make the gun unable to operate. Maybe this is a non-firing model of the SMG. I also have a guess that as the movie was filmed in Chile, this gun may be some Chilean domestic produced gun. Chilean gun manufacturer FAMAE acted from 19th century, possibly it produced some original weapons, but I couldn't find anything similar. --Greg-Z (talk) 02:45, 17 November 2020 (EST)
A bit of photoshop:
As far as I can see, the gun has a skeleton buttstock, as through it we can see the crease of the uniform. --Greg-Z (talk) 05:13, 17 November 2020 (EST)