| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Evans Repeating Rifle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The Russian Navy and even the army bought a small number of them, but as far as is known, they were never widely used. Perhaps the whole problem was again in the cartridges. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 17:46, 5 September 2020 (EDT) | The Russian Navy and even the army bought a small number of them, but as far as is known, they were never widely used. Perhaps the whole problem was again in the cartridges. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 17:46, 5 September 2020 (EDT) | ||
:I did not know that. Thanks. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] ([[User talk:Jcordell|talk]]) 20:47, 5 September 2020 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:47, 6 September 2020
Additional Images
Discussion
Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - Gunmaster45
You have to wonder how expensive the ammo was since it was made for that rifle alone. --Jcordell 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
The Russian Navy and even the army bought a small number of them, but as far as is known, they were never widely used. Perhaps the whole problem was again in the cartridges. --Slon95 (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2020 (EDT)