| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Bergmann MP 18: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pyr0m4n14c (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Image:Mp18_right.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Bergmann MP18 - 9x19mm]] | [[Image:Mp18_right.jpg|thumb|none|450px|Bergmann MP18 - 9x19mm]] | ||
= Discussion = | =Discussion= | ||
Should the MP28 ,Lanchester SMG, and Steyr Solothurn S1\100 pages be combined on this page? | Should the MP28 ,Lanchester SMG, and Steyr Solothurn S1\100 pages be combined on this page? | ||
:What are the visual differences between the MP18 and MP28, if any? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 02:53, 21 April 2013 (EDT) | |||
::I will raise the question once again: should the MP18, MP28 and Lanchester not be combined on one page, given that these are different versions of the same weapon? --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 08:49, 14 January 2020 (EST) | |||
What are the visual differences between the MP18 and MP28, if any? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 02:53, 21 April 2013 (EDT) | :::I vote yes for combining the MP18, MP28, Lanchester, and the Sig M1920 onto a single page, along with perhaps the MP34/Steyr Solothurn S1/100 as well. --[[User:AK-74Fan|AK-74Fan]] ([[User talk:AK-74Fan|talk]]) 11:30, 14 January 2020 (EST) | ||
::::I'd agree with the MP28, Lanchester, and SIG M1920, though the MP34 is different enough that I think it merits a separate page. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 18:34, 14 January 2020 (EST) P.S.: Just so you know, AK-74Fan, "SIG" is supposed to be in all caps, since it's an acronym. | |||
I will raise the question once again: should the MP18, MP28 and Lanchester not be combined on one page, given that these are different versions of the same weapon? --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 08:49, 14 January 2020 (EST) | ==Start using== | ||
I vote yes for combining the MP18, MP28, Lanchester, and the Sig M1920 onto a single page, along with perhaps the MP34/Steyr Solothurn S1/100 as well. --[[User:AK-74Fan|AK-74Fan]] ([[User talk:AK-74Fan|talk]]) 11:30, 14 January 2020 (EST) | |||
== Start using == | |||
It is true, that Bergmann-Schmeisser MP started to use before 1918? I ran across a rumor, that they are delivered with 1916 (More then the original structure, with magazines - "sticks"), but no concrete evidence for this is not found. [[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 16 January 2015 (EDT) | It is true, that Bergmann-Schmeisser MP started to use before 1918? I ran across a rumor, that they are delivered with 1916 (More then the original structure, with magazines - "sticks"), but no concrete evidence for this is not found. [[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 16 January 2015 (EDT) | ||
== Post-war mag well == | ==Post-war mag well== | ||
If the post-war MP18's were refitted/produced with the MP28 magwell, then does that mean it could also load from the MP28/Lancaster 50-round magazines? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] ([[User talk:HashiriyaR32|talk]]) 13:28, 8 December 2018 (EST) | If the post-war MP18's were refitted/produced with the MP28 magwell, then does that mean it could also load from the MP28/Lancaster 50-round magazines? --[[User:HashiriyaR32|HashiriyaR32]] ([[User talk:HashiriyaR32|talk]]) 13:28, 8 December 2018 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 14 January 2020
Additional Images
Discussion
Should the MP28 ,Lanchester SMG, and Steyr Solothurn S1\100 pages be combined on this page?
- What are the visual differences between the MP18 and MP28, if any? --Funkychinaman (talk) 02:53, 21 April 2013 (EDT)
- I will raise the question once again: should the MP18, MP28 and Lanchester not be combined on one page, given that these are different versions of the same weapon? --Slon95 (talk) 08:49, 14 January 2020 (EST)
- I vote yes for combining the MP18, MP28, Lanchester, and the Sig M1920 onto a single page, along with perhaps the MP34/Steyr Solothurn S1/100 as well. --AK-74Fan (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2020 (EST)
- I'd agree with the MP28, Lanchester, and SIG M1920, though the MP34 is different enough that I think it merits a separate page. Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 18:34, 14 January 2020 (EST) P.S.: Just so you know, AK-74Fan, "SIG" is supposed to be in all caps, since it's an acronym.
- I vote yes for combining the MP18, MP28, Lanchester, and the Sig M1920 onto a single page, along with perhaps the MP34/Steyr Solothurn S1/100 as well. --AK-74Fan (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2020 (EST)
- I will raise the question once again: should the MP18, MP28 and Lanchester not be combined on one page, given that these are different versions of the same weapon? --Slon95 (talk) 08:49, 14 January 2020 (EST)
Start using
It is true, that Bergmann-Schmeisser MP started to use before 1918? I ran across a rumor, that they are delivered with 1916 (More then the original structure, with magazines - "sticks"), but no concrete evidence for this is not found. Slon95 (talk) 16 January 2015 (EDT)
Post-war mag well
If the post-war MP18's were refitted/produced with the MP28 magwell, then does that mean it could also load from the MP28/Lancaster 50-round magazines? --HashiriyaR32 (talk) 13:28, 8 December 2018 (EST)