| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Evans Repeating Rifle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Additional Images= | |||
[[File:Evansriflebigpic.jpg|none|thumb|400px]] | |||
[[File:Evans Two.jpg|thumb|none|400px]] | |||
=Discussion= | |||
Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | ||
You have to wonder how expensive the ammo was since it was made for that rifle alone. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | You have to wonder how expensive the ammo was since it was made for that rifle alone. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:33, 30 October 2019
Additional Images
Discussion
Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - Gunmaster45
You have to wonder how expensive the ammo was since it was made for that rifle alone. --Jcordell 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)