| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:King Kong (2005): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Alienqueen11 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
AdAstra2009 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Go ahead, I rushed through the movie when I screencapped because it was so long.--[[User:Alienqueen11|Alienqueen11]] 20:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | Go ahead, I rushed through the movie when I screencapped because it was so long.--[[User:Alienqueen11|Alienqueen11]] 20:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Cannon== | |||
It '''may''' have been selected as the weapon is still (2008) in use and ammunition produced for it; the British ''Royal Horse Artillery'' use the cannon, on a conventional carriage mount, for ceremonial purposes such as firing salutes and participating in military "tattoos". However this is mere speculation. | |||
It goes without saying that this weapon was never, in reality, used either by the US Army or by any National Guard unit. | |||
''However it's very cool looking and fits the time period.'' Jcordell | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 19 May 2009
- If I get some time, I wanted to add just a few (and I mean FEW) caps from the movie, because some really nice closeups were over looked. - Gunmaster45
Go ahead, I rushed through the movie when I screencapped because it was so long.--Alienqueen11 20:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Cannon
It may have been selected as the weapon is still (2008) in use and ammunition produced for it; the British Royal Horse Artillery use the cannon, on a conventional carriage mount, for ceremonial purposes such as firing salutes and participating in military "tattoos". However this is mere speculation.
It goes without saying that this weapon was never, in reality, used either by the US Army or by any National Guard unit.
However it's very cool looking and fits the time period. Jcordell