| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Malay Regiment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The revolver isn't Enfield as it is not a top-break. As for me, it looks more like Smith & Wesson Military & Police. ~~~~") |
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The revolver isn't Enfield as it is not a top-break. As for me, it looks more like [[Smith & Wesson Military & Police]]. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:32, 16 January 2018 (EST) | The revolver isn't Enfield as it is not a top-break. As for me, it looks more like [[Smith & Wesson Military & Police]]. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:32, 16 January 2018 (EST) | ||
:My guess would be a Colt revolver like the Police Positive. If it was an M&P it would have to be a really early one (by that I mean more than 100 years old at this point) as it has no lug under the barrel for the front of the ejector rod. That image is too blurry to make out what is for sure (at least to me). --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 06:24, 21 January 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:24, 21 January 2018
The revolver isn't Enfield as it is not a top-break. As for me, it looks more like Smith & Wesson Military & Police. Greg-Z (talk) 11:32, 16 January 2018 (EST)
- My guess would be a Colt revolver like the Police Positive. If it was an M&P it would have to be a really early one (by that I mean more than 100 years old at this point) as it has no lug under the barrel for the front of the ejector rod. That image is too blurry to make out what is for sure (at least to me). --commando552 (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2018 (EST)