| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Ohio Ordnance HCAR: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) m (→Categorization) |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Categorization== | ==Categorization== | ||
I'd subclassify this much closer to a SLR sorta like like that of semiauto only FALs, SKS, etc, but since we don't have a category of that sort, well.. I will say this, it can't be an 'assault rifle' due to the use of a 'full-size' rifle caliber, otherwise we'd classify the original BAR as such also. I'm sorry but it ''not'' being chambered for a full-size cartridge is a characteristic that it must have to be classified as such, end of. It also isn't a 'battle rifle' as the general use of the term here isn't just about caliber/characteristics but also to denote weapons that were standard- or mass-issue for battle forces, which this also is not. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 14:58, 28 January 2017 (EST) | I'd subclassify this much closer to a SLR sorta like like that of semiauto only FALs, SKS, etc, but since we don't have a category of that sort, well.. I will say this, it can't be an 'assault rifle' due to the use of a 'full-size' rifle caliber, otherwise we'd classify the original BAR as such also. I'm sorry but it ''not'' being chambered for a full-size cartridge is a characteristic that it must have to be classified as such, end of. It also isn't a 'battle rifle' as the general use of the term here isn't just about caliber/characteristics but also to denote weapons that were standard- or mass-issue for battle forces, which this also is not. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 14:58, 28 January 2017 (EST) | ||
: That being said, I really think this should just be made a section on the BAR page, not given it's own page. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:03, 28 January 2017 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:03, 28 January 2017
Categorization
I'd subclassify this much closer to a SLR sorta like like that of semiauto only FALs, SKS, etc, but since we don't have a category of that sort, well.. I will say this, it can't be an 'assault rifle' due to the use of a 'full-size' rifle caliber, otherwise we'd classify the original BAR as such also. I'm sorry but it not being chambered for a full-size cartridge is a characteristic that it must have to be classified as such, end of. It also isn't a 'battle rifle' as the general use of the term here isn't just about caliber/characteristics but also to denote weapons that were standard- or mass-issue for battle forces, which this also is not. StanTheMan (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2017 (EST)
- That being said, I really think this should just be made a section on the BAR page, not given it's own page. StanTheMan (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2017 (EST)