| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:In the Mouth of Madness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Here is the screencap from the movie. I'm very confident that it's a Model 10. | Here is the screencap from the movie. I'm very confident that it's a Model 10. | ||
[[Image:mouth_of_madness1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Closeup of one of the officers' Smith & Wessons as he fires.]] | [[Image:mouth_of_madness1.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Closeup of one of the officers' Smith & Wessons as he fires.]] | ||
:Hi JC, good comment, you are totally right. Two other arguments in favor of the S&W Model 10: (1) the relative position of the front part of the ejector rod as opposed to the front sight, and (2) the design of the part of the frame in front of the cylinder holding the ejector rod. - [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 14:45, 20 August 2016 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:45, 20 August 2016
It's a Smith & Wesson Model 10
- It's subtle and I would have loved to have left the revolver as a Smith & Wesson Model 58, but look at the cylinder release latch and the edge of the frame. --Jcordell (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2016 (EDT)
Note how there is more steel between the cylinder release latch and the edge of the frame on the Model 58 as compared to the Model 10.
Here is the screencap from the movie. I'm very confident that it's a Model 10.
- Hi JC, good comment, you are totally right. Two other arguments in favor of the S&W Model 10: (1) the relative position of the front part of the ejector rod as opposed to the front sight, and (2) the design of the part of the frame in front of the cylinder holding the ejector rod. - PeeWee055 (talk) 14:45, 20 August 2016 (EDT)