| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Dragnet Girl: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I don't think that first revolver is a Type 26 . Maybe an Iver Johnson? --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think that first revolver is a Type 26 . Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 21:35, 15 June 2016 (EDT) | I don't think that first revolver is a Type 26 . Maybe an Iver Johnson? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 21:35, 15 June 2016 (EDT) | ||
:I concur with Iver Johnson. I also think that revolvers, identified as Smith & Wesson Schofield and Smith & Wesson .44 Double Action, seem to be the same gun, and .44 Double Action appears to be a better guess than Schofield (the screen revolver lacks the long bar under the barrel that is typical for Schofield). [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 04:06, 16 June 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:06, 16 June 2016
I don't think that first revolver is a Type 26 . Maybe an Iver Johnson? --Funkychinaman (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2016 (EDT)
- I concur with Iver Johnson. I also think that revolvers, identified as Smith & Wesson Schofield and Smith & Wesson .44 Double Action, seem to be the same gun, and .44 Double Action appears to be a better guess than Schofield (the screen revolver lacks the long bar under the barrel that is typical for Schofield). Greg-Z (talk) 04:06, 16 June 2016 (EDT)