| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Dirty Harry: Difference between revisions
(→Rifle as Evidence: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I've come across literature that claims the movie folks could not find any Model 29's for sale in 1970 so S&W was contacted. Supposedly all that S&W had was parts for the Model 29 with the 6.5" barrel.So S&W put a couple Model 29's together for the movie. Supposedly John Milius wrote the script with Callahan carrying the Model 29 with the 4" barrel. Once again who knows if this is accurate or not. [[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] | I've come across literature that claims the movie folks could not find any Model 29's for sale in 1970 so S&W was contacted. Supposedly all that S&W had was parts for the Model 29 with the 6.5" barrel.So S&W put a couple Model 29's together for the movie. Supposedly John Milius wrote the script with Callahan carrying the Model 29 with the 4" barrel. Once again who knows if this is accurate or not. [[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] | ||
== Rifle as Evidence == | |||
The reason the rifle was not viable evidence is because it was "fruit of the poisonous tree." Harry had no warrant to search the stadium so evidence pulled from the scene is not admissible in court. this is the reason stated in the movie BUT any halfway decent cop and district attorney would make it a legal search due to it being "fresh pursuit" not to mention the exigent circumstance of said pursuit. moreover scorpio could only get the protection of that statute if he were a legal resident of the stadium and i am pretty sure he wouldn't be recognized as such legally. so in reality it wouldn't happen quite like that, but the entire movie was an exercise of complaint at the systems apparent apathy towards victims rights and total obsession with criminal rights. so the whole point is rendered moot. just felt like sharing. | |||
Revision as of 03:42, 31 March 2009
I've read that the gun actually was a Model 25 in .45 Colt. The substitution for the M29 was lack of availability of a M29 and the easy availability of blank cartridges in .45 Colt (which were probably widely used in Colt Peacemakers in Westerns).
- I heard it was a Model 57 in .41 caliber, but it makes more sense for it to be a Model 25, because .45 Colt blanks were very common thanks to the ridiculous amount of westerns made during that time. - Gunmaster45
The Model 29 Legend
I've heard many different stories about the S&W revolvers used in Dirty Harry over the years.But evidently there is no actual documentation to back up any of the stories. Maybe nobody really wants to know the "truth" because it's funner to jawbone about all the possible models used.Jcordell
I've come across literature that claims the movie folks could not find any Model 29's for sale in 1970 so S&W was contacted. Supposedly all that S&W had was parts for the Model 29 with the 6.5" barrel.So S&W put a couple Model 29's together for the movie. Supposedly John Milius wrote the script with Callahan carrying the Model 29 with the 4" barrel. Once again who knows if this is accurate or not. Jcordell
Rifle as Evidence
The reason the rifle was not viable evidence is because it was "fruit of the poisonous tree." Harry had no warrant to search the stadium so evidence pulled from the scene is not admissible in court. this is the reason stated in the movie BUT any halfway decent cop and district attorney would make it a legal search due to it being "fresh pursuit" not to mention the exigent circumstance of said pursuit. moreover scorpio could only get the protection of that statute if he were a legal resident of the stadium and i am pretty sure he wouldn't be recognized as such legally. so in reality it wouldn't happen quite like that, but the entire movie was an exercise of complaint at the systems apparent apathy towards victims rights and total obsession with criminal rights. so the whole point is rendered moot. just felt like sharing.