Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Colt 45: Difference between revisions
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
BlackHawk510 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Looks like the HK416 to me. --[[User:RedRobinAlpha|RedRobinAlpha]] ([[User talk:RedRobinAlpha|talk]]) 22:06, 19 July 2015 (GMT) | :Looks like the HK416 to me. --[[User:RedRobinAlpha|RedRobinAlpha]] ([[User talk:RedRobinAlpha|talk]]) 22:06, 19 July 2015 (GMT) | ||
::I think it is the same rifle as the one that is currently labelled as an HK416. However, that rifle is absolutely 100% not an HK416. Firstly, if you look at the selector markings they are normal plain text ones as opposed to the H&K pictograms that are painted in. Granted, this is not necessarily deffinitive as the lower could have been changed, however there are difference with the upper as well. On the HK416 the receiver rail steps up away from the receiver about an inch ahead of the charging handle (I believe to give it extra room for the piston design), however this rifle doesn't do this, instead being the normal AR-15 shape. Related to this, you can also see that the barrel is located vertically in the middle of the handguard, whereas on an HK416 it is below the centre line (still in line with the middle of the side rail, but the top rail is set higher away from the barrel than the bottom). Lastly, the handguard is a Samson STAR-MX, which doesn't fit on an HK416. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:01, 19 July 2015 (EDT) | ::I think it is the same rifle as the one that is currently labelled as an HK416. However, that rifle is absolutely 100% not an HK416. Firstly, if you look at the selector markings they are normal plain text ones as opposed to the H&K pictograms that are painted in. Granted, this is not necessarily deffinitive as the lower could have been changed, however there are difference with the upper as well. On the HK416 the receiver rail steps up away from the receiver about an inch ahead of the charging handle (I believe to give it extra room for the piston design), however this rifle doesn't do this, instead being the normal AR-15 shape. Related to this, you can also see that the barrel is located vertically in the middle of the handguard, whereas on an HK416 it is below the centre line (still in line with the middle of the side rail, but the top rail is set higher away from the barrel than the bottom). Lastly, the handguard is a Samson STAR-MX, which doesn't fit on an HK416. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:01, 19 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::I noticed this too, Maybe we should change it to "Custom AR15"?--[[User:BlackHawk510|BlackHawk510]] ([[User talk:BlackHawk510|talk]]) 11:54, 21 March 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:54, 21 March 2016
Unidentified Weapons
Unidentified pistol looks like a 'SIG Sauer P226 X5', also The unidentified Sniper Rifle looks like a 'Nemesis Arms Vanquish' but the second image in the section is of the HK416 not the Sniper Rifle.--RedRobinAlpha (talk) 22:13, 07 May 2015 (GMT)
- The Benelli looks more like a shorty or 'Entry' M3 Super-90 rather than an M4. StanTheMan (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2015 (EDT)
- This is the latest version of the M3 with a retractable stock, which I believe may have been developed for a NZ military contract: Benelli calls it an M3, but in reality it appears to be a hybrid of a whole load of Benelli products, with a pump action from the M3, a receiver and trigger guard from the M2, stock from a Benelli Supernova (same as the Beretta Rx4 Storm), and the sights, rail and bolt handle from an M4. Incidentally, there is actually a Benelli M4 in this movie, there is one at the top of the weapons cabinet on the right:Also in this shot is a Colt Model 727 below the Benelli M4, an H&K UMP on the rack on the left, and a couple of un-100%-identifiable AR-15 carbines. --commando552 (talk) 11:58, 9 May 2015 (EDT)
Only the last two caps definitively show a Para-Ordnance M1911. The others are a clearly different pistol. --Funkychinaman (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2015 (EDT) All is Para - http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:Para_Ordinance_P-18_9mm.jpg
Lieutenant Joseph Fleischmann (Antoine Basler) is seen with an unidentified revolver.
In some scenes are seen unidentified assault rifles.--Pandolfini (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2015 (EDT)
- Top one looks like a Beretta ARX-160 --RedRobinAlpha (talk) 00:18, 08 May 2015 (GMT) Thx!--Pandolfini (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2015 (EDT)
- Bottom one isn't an assault rifle, it is a FN Minimi Para. --commando552 (talk) 10:20, 9 May 2015 (EDT)
What weapons used during a firefight by these thugs?--Pandolfini (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
#
- Looks like the HK416 to me. --RedRobinAlpha (talk) 22:06, 19 July 2015 (GMT)
- I think it is the same rifle as the one that is currently labelled as an HK416. However, that rifle is absolutely 100% not an HK416. Firstly, if you look at the selector markings they are normal plain text ones as opposed to the H&K pictograms that are painted in. Granted, this is not necessarily deffinitive as the lower could have been changed, however there are difference with the upper as well. On the HK416 the receiver rail steps up away from the receiver about an inch ahead of the charging handle (I believe to give it extra room for the piston design), however this rifle doesn't do this, instead being the normal AR-15 shape. Related to this, you can also see that the barrel is located vertically in the middle of the handguard, whereas on an HK416 it is below the centre line (still in line with the middle of the side rail, but the top rail is set higher away from the barrel than the bottom). Lastly, the handguard is a Samson STAR-MX, which doesn't fit on an HK416. --commando552 (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2015 (EDT)
- I noticed this too, Maybe we should change it to "Custom AR15"?--BlackHawk510 (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2016 (EDT)
- I think it is the same rifle as the one that is currently labelled as an HK416. However, that rifle is absolutely 100% not an HK416. Firstly, if you look at the selector markings they are normal plain text ones as opposed to the H&K pictograms that are painted in. Granted, this is not necessarily deffinitive as the lower could have been changed, however there are difference with the upper as well. On the HK416 the receiver rail steps up away from the receiver about an inch ahead of the charging handle (I believe to give it extra room for the piston design), however this rifle doesn't do this, instead being the normal AR-15 shape. Related to this, you can also see that the barrel is located vertically in the middle of the handguard, whereas on an HK416 it is below the centre line (still in line with the middle of the side rail, but the top rail is set higher away from the barrel than the bottom). Lastly, the handguard is a Samson STAR-MX, which doesn't fit on an HK416. --commando552 (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2015 (EDT)