| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Snowpiercer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The rifle with the EOtech doesn't look like a 416. The shape of the rail isn't the same and the lower receiver itself doesn't have the HK markings [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 00:41, 26 February 2015 (EST) | The rifle with the EOtech doesn't look like a 416. The shape of the rail isn't the same and the lower receiver itself doesn't have the HK markings [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 00:41, 26 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:They are probably Luvo Arms carbines, since the film was mostly shot in the Czech Republic --[[User:Warejaws|Warejaws]] ([[User talk:Warejaws|talk]]) 02:57, 26 February 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 07:57, 26 February 2015
Please help ID
Please help with these rifles. --Ben41 (talk) 23:16, 25 February 2015 (EST)
Gun in the first two pictures look like a Close Quarters Battle Receiver, and the gun in the last two pictures looks like a Heckler & Koch HK416. Hi, My Name Is GameZone (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2015 (EST)
The rifle with the EOtech doesn't look like a 416. The shape of the rail isn't the same and the lower receiver itself doesn't have the HK markings Excalibur01 (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2015 (EST)