| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:I Know Who Killed Me: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I went ahead and did so because per the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#It_must_have_more_than_one_real_firearm_in_it|RSP Section regarding the single firearm exceptions]], I don't think this page comes even close to meeting any of the requirements of said exceptions to the 'more than one firearm' rule. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Apologies if I'm wrong in this instance (though I doubt I am). [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 20:16, 11 February 2015 (EST) | I went ahead and did so because per the [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#It_must_have_more_than_one_real_firearm_in_it|RSP Section regarding the single firearm exceptions]], I don't think this page comes even close to meeting any of the requirements of said exceptions to the 'more than one firearm' rule. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Apologies if I'm wrong in this instance (though I doubt I am). [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 20:16, 11 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:The exceptions can be subjective, and if it's a decently formatted page, I tend to be more lenient. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 21:23, 11 February 2015 (EST) | :The exceptions can be subjective, and if it's a decently formatted page, I tend to be more lenient. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 21:23, 11 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:: I do agree the page is well-made. But that alone has not saved pages from deletion in the past. My issue here is this feels more like a case of documenting the film more than it is documenting the firearm(s) - The site, as I've always understood, is more to document firearms in films, rather than films that happen to have firearms. Which is why there are stipulations such as 'more than one firearm' and why there are particular exceptions to that stipulation and so on. If that makes any sense.<BR><BR> I just don't feel (or at least, aren't sure) that this page meets the standard(s) expected of the site as | :: I do agree the page is well-made. But that alone has not saved pages from deletion in the past. My issue here is this feels more like a case of documenting the film more than it is documenting the firearm(s) - The site, as I've always understood, is more to document firearms in films, rather than films that happen to have firearms. Which is why there are stipulations such as 'more than one firearm' and why there are particular exceptions to that stipulation and so on. If that makes any sense.<BR><BR> I just don't feel (or at least, aren't sure) that this page meets the standard(s) expected of the site as stated - The Glocks on this page are stated to be G17s but we really can't positively verify that with the images given (They seem to be full-size Glocks though, so the 17 is a good bet, I grant you). And again, as I've pointed out, it's the only listed firearm and that one listed firearm doesn't appear to be shown well enough for a viewer to ponder or even make real note of it nor seems to important or notable in regards to the film itself.<BR><BR> I'm only going by what is clearly stated, though I understand the RSP isn't written in stone and can be applied however you guys see fit. Ultimately it makes no huge difference to me whether it stays or goes, but all-told, this page is certainly worth marking for deletion if only to bring it to you guys' attention to decide accordingly. Just expressing my concerns, as always I'll defer to you guys however this goes. Apologies again if I'm in the wrong here. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 22:38, 11 February 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 03:40, 12 February 2015
Marked for deletion
I went ahead and did so because per the RSP Section regarding the single firearm exceptions, I don't think this page comes even close to meeting any of the requirements of said exceptions to the 'more than one firearm' rule. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Apologies if I'm wrong in this instance (though I doubt I am). StanTheMan (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2015 (EST)
- The exceptions can be subjective, and if it's a decently formatted page, I tend to be more lenient. --Funkychinaman (talk) 21:23, 11 February 2015 (EST)
- I do agree the page is well-made. But that alone has not saved pages from deletion in the past. My issue here is this feels more like a case of documenting the film more than it is documenting the firearm(s) - The site, as I've always understood, is more to document firearms in films, rather than films that happen to have firearms. Which is why there are stipulations such as 'more than one firearm' and why there are particular exceptions to that stipulation and so on. If that makes any sense.
I just don't feel (or at least, aren't sure) that this page meets the standard(s) expected of the site as stated - The Glocks on this page are stated to be G17s but we really can't positively verify that with the images given (They seem to be full-size Glocks though, so the 17 is a good bet, I grant you). And again, as I've pointed out, it's the only listed firearm and that one listed firearm doesn't appear to be shown well enough for a viewer to ponder or even make real note of it nor seems to important or notable in regards to the film itself.
I'm only going by what is clearly stated, though I understand the RSP isn't written in stone and can be applied however you guys see fit. Ultimately it makes no huge difference to me whether it stays or goes, but all-told, this page is certainly worth marking for deletion if only to bring it to you guys' attention to decide accordingly. Just expressing my concerns, as always I'll defer to you guys however this goes. Apologies again if I'm in the wrong here. StanTheMan (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2015 (EST)
- I do agree the page is well-made. But that alone has not saved pages from deletion in the past. My issue here is this feels more like a case of documenting the film more than it is documenting the firearm(s) - The site, as I've always understood, is more to document firearms in films, rather than films that happen to have firearms. Which is why there are stipulations such as 'more than one firearm' and why there are particular exceptions to that stipulation and so on. If that makes any sense.