| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:2 cm FlaK 38: Difference between revisions
m (Evil Tim moved page Talk:FlaK 38 to Talk:2cm FlaK 38) |
(→Recent Edits by Evil Tim: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Ultimately, because real ones have appeared in movies. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:55, 28 January 2012 (CST) | :Ultimately, because real ones have appeared in movies. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:55, 28 January 2012 (CST) | ||
== Recent Edits by Evil Tim == | |||
There was a discussion thread here: http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=2379 | |||
We talked about standardizing the pages for the heavy weapons. The reason I chose the exact name of this page is because it would then be finally standardized with other already existing pages: | |||
2 cm Flak 38 | |||
3.7 cm Pak 35/36 | |||
5 cm Pak 38 | |||
7.5 cm Pak 40 | |||
This is why I chose the format. Now with your edits the standardization is gone again and everything was worthless what I did.....so can you please undo your edits? | |||
I created the thread in the forums to disuss my changes and additions before I did anything because I KNEW there would be somebody who would disagree (this is ALWAYS the case here on this site). | |||
I know that people have different opinions but we have to settle for something sometimes otherwise we will never get any work done and edit those pages again and again and again.... so why didn't you want to leave it as I did it? It made sense, was standardized, I even started a discussion thread for this, it was the most common name used on the Internet and in discussion boards, so what is the reason you thought it would not be ok? | |||
I intend to add a lot more guns very soon so we HAVE to agree on a standardization...otherwise this will get a complete mess with every page getting edited a few minutes after I completed my work... | |||
Can you please revert your edits?--[[User:Hchris|Hchris]] ([[User talk:Hchris|talk]]) 14:55, 9 February 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 19:55, 9 February 2015
???
Why make a page for a flak gun? Flak guns, artillaries, and such are not allowed to have their own page. - Kenny99 01:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
There are already quite a few pages for autocannons. If the GAU-8, M242 Bushmaster, M61 Vulcan or especially the Bofors 40mm get pages, I don't see why this one shouldn't. Jimmoy 05:40, 28 January 2012 (CST)
- Ultimately, because real ones have appeared in movies. Evil Tim 05:55, 28 January 2012 (CST)
Recent Edits by Evil Tim
There was a discussion thread here: http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=2379
We talked about standardizing the pages for the heavy weapons. The reason I chose the exact name of this page is because it would then be finally standardized with other already existing pages:
2 cm Flak 38 3.7 cm Pak 35/36 5 cm Pak 38 7.5 cm Pak 40
This is why I chose the format. Now with your edits the standardization is gone again and everything was worthless what I did.....so can you please undo your edits?
I created the thread in the forums to disuss my changes and additions before I did anything because I KNEW there would be somebody who would disagree (this is ALWAYS the case here on this site). I know that people have different opinions but we have to settle for something sometimes otherwise we will never get any work done and edit those pages again and again and again.... so why didn't you want to leave it as I did it? It made sense, was standardized, I even started a discussion thread for this, it was the most common name used on the Internet and in discussion boards, so what is the reason you thought it would not be ok? I intend to add a lot more guns very soon so we HAVE to agree on a standardization...otherwise this will get a complete mess with every page getting edited a few minutes after I completed my work... Can you please revert your edits?--Hchris (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2015 (EST)