| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Let's Be Cops: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I agree 150%, how the mistake was made I don't quite know [[User:Sandymon|Sandymon]] ([[User talk:Sandymon|talk]]) | I agree 150%, how the mistake was made I don't quite know [[User:Sandymon|Sandymon]] ([[User talk:Sandymon|talk]]) | ||
It's because of the shape of the magazine, the magazine's grooves, and the appearance of the gun. Since the gun was black or dark gray, I assumed it the HK51.--[[User:Gunnerboy|Gunnerboy]] ([[User talk:Gunnerboy|talk]]) 20:15, 15 November 2014 (EST) | It's because of the shape of the magazine, the magazine's grooves, and the appearance of the gun. Since the gun was black or dark gray, I assumed it the HK51.--[[User:Gunnerboy|Gunnerboy]] ([[User talk:Gunnerboy|talk]]) 20:15, 15 November 2014 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 16 November 2014
I think the Heckler & Koch HK51 is actually a FN SCAR. --Luxarms (talk)
I agree 150%, how the mistake was made I don't quite know Sandymon (talk)
It's because of the shape of the magazine, the magazine's grooves, and the appearance of the gun. Since the gun was black or dark gray, I assumed it the HK51.--Gunnerboy (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2014 (EST)
Guns that need further analysis check.
I know the first one below is a picture of AKs, but which one specifically? The AKMS, the Romanian AIMS, etc? Help me identify the guns below.
