| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:China Lake Launcher: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Spartan198 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Additional Images== | ==Additional Images== | ||
[[Image:US M79 pump-action four-shot 40x46mm grenade launcher.jpg|thumb|none|400px|China Lake Launcher - 40x46mm]] | [[Image:US M79 pump-action four-shot 40x46mm grenade launcher.jpg|thumb|none|400px|China Lake Launcher - 40x46mm]] | ||
==Why no renewed interest in this?== | |||
Seems like with the transition back toward standalone grenade launchers like the M32, a platform like this with significantly less bulk would be looked at as an alternate option. Even with the lower round capacity, I'd personally take this over an M32. If I'm not mistaken, there's a company building modernized versions of the China Lake. Anyone seen any evidence of them being used? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 02:56, 17 November 2013 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 07:56, 17 November 2013
Why does the Ramo RT-37 redirect to here? They don't appear to be related. --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2012 (EST) They arn't related at all. the China Lake Launcher is closer to the M79 than anything else.Rockwolf66 (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2012 (EST)
Additional Images
Why no renewed interest in this?
Seems like with the transition back toward standalone grenade launchers like the M32, a platform like this with significantly less bulk would be looked at as an alternate option. Even with the lower round capacity, I'd personally take this over an M32. If I'm not mistaken, there's a company building modernized versions of the China Lake. Anyone seen any evidence of them being used? Spartan198 (talk) 02:56, 17 November 2013 (EST)