Talk:Strike Back - Season 4: Difference between revisions
Talk:Strike Back - Season 4: Difference between revisions - Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Talk:Strike Back - Season 4: Difference between revisions
:I just rewatched it, and he has it in the small of his back after he puts his vest on and they are preparing to leave, but in the next shot with them walking through the lobby it is gone. It stays absent for the firefight, before reappearing when they commandeer the car and is still there at the safe house. My guess is that it disappears for this scene due to it being a liability considering the stunts he was doing in that shootout (getting thrown back onto the table when shot, crawling across the floor on his back while covering Scott, stuff like that). Also, in one shot it looks like he is wearing a pad or protector under his shirt on his lower back in this scene *for the getting shot stunt) which would interfere with the gun. I saw a behind the scenes thing about this shootout and the way they tend to film these scenes is to choreograph it with multiple cameras and do long takes that cover the whole of the action, so if the gun needed to be missing for one stunt it would be missing for most of the scene. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:04, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
:I just rewatched it, and he has it in the small of his back after he puts his vest on and they are preparing to leave, but in the next shot with them walking through the lobby it is gone. It stays absent for the firefight, before reappearing when they commandeer the car and is still there at the safe house. My guess is that it disappears for this scene due to it being a liability considering the stunts he was doing in that shootout (getting thrown back onto the table when shot, crawling across the floor on his back while covering Scott, stuff like that). Also, in one shot it looks like he is wearing a pad or protector under his shirt on his lower back in this scene *for the getting shot stunt) which would interfere with the gun. I saw a behind the scenes thing about this shootout and the way they tend to film these scenes is to choreograph it with multiple cameras and do long takes that cover the whole of the action, so if the gun needed to be missing for one stunt it would be missing for most of the scene. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:04, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
:Here are some pics:[[File:Strike Back S04E02 Glock 1.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Once they exist the bank the Glock is gone.]][[File:Strike Back S04E02 Glock 2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Also he clearly wearing some kind of pad or spine protector.]][[File:Strike Back S04E02 Glock3.jpg|thumb|500px|none|When commandering the car the spine protector is gone and the Glock is back.]]--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:15, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
:Here are some pics:[[File:Strike Back S04E02 Glock 1.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Once they exist the bank the Glock is gone.]][[File:Strike Back S04E02 Glock 2.jpg|thumb|500px|none|Also he clearly wearing some kind of pad or spine protector.]][[File:Strike Back S04E02 Glock3.jpg|thumb|500px|none|When commandering the car the spine protector is gone and the Glock is back.]]--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:15, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
The actor said in one of the behind the scenes video's that they now wear lots of padding --[[User:Iceman|Iceman]] ([[User talk:Iceman|talk]]) 06:41, 22 August 2013 (EDT)
Revision as of 10:41, 22 August 2013
OK , I admit I'm clueless what Stonebridge uses, at first it seemed like a modified Vikhr or a 9A91, but its clearly not, so did they chop something up? --Iceman (talk) 15:43, 10 August 2013 (EDT)
Yup, definitely a shorty Vz 58. Took me awhile to notice the magwell adapter, but definitely you knew it wasn't a 7.62x39 gun with the shape of the mag. 52TulaSKS (talk) 02:56, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
Noticed the STANAG M4 mag straight away , since I was thinking weird choice , but at least they can share mags. I mean it really is a weird choice, it even has the old lastochkin hvost scope mount thats what made me think it was russian. --Iceman (talk) 06:39, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
Did you notice the part in the episode where the scope mount falls off and hits him in the face? I agree it is a weird choice, particularly for a British team operating in Columbia, but I have long since suspended my disbelief about nonsensical guns when watching films and TV filmed in SA. I think it is pretty cool looking though with those accessories, I can see why they chose to use it. Kind of weird though that is is a Czech gun, and the only things it has appeared in are filmed in Canada and South Africa. --commando552 (talk) 11:30, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
Yeah that was weird, could be because the scope is a bit too heavy ( ussually they have like a eotech's or cobra's on those mounts) or due too recoil (they probably fire the gun all day, doubtful they do it in one take and the firing scenes are probably back to back) But the show is sort of guilty pleasure for me, you know unrealistic and all but great fun, could have less nudity on Scott's part though its anoying since it does nothing to the story and its like 2 minutes each ep. But gun porn is always fun, I guess the gun makes sense, its short and all if they could not get their hands on anything else, but its weird that Scott and the new chick have M4 types, they also filmed some stuff in soviet block countries after 4th episode. What I don't like about the new season is the chick fest OK Richmond is mostly support and Dalton used to be a honey-pott so she sort of works as a middle level spook, but how many women are believable as badass in a small unit as this, and there is the Israeli agent and there was Grant. --Iceman (talk) 12:26, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
My guess about the scope mount is that the release lever got caught on something, as after that point it has tape over it. I haven't seen much about future episodes, just the season trailer and a few promo images, but it looks like they are making rhe vz. 58 Compact their go-to gun. TBH I don't really have too much of a problem with it, its not like they are regular forces (or even part of UKSF), and I have seen SAS/SBS using all kinds of AK variants when trying to look local in Iraq/Afghanistan. --commando552 (talk) 13:39, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
One of the guys in the boat with Scott and Stonebridge has an AR-15 carbine that looks to resemble a Colt Model 723, but it's hard to make out the details of the receiver. Spartan198 (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
When I watched it I thought it was one of their M4 type rifles same as Martinez and Scott so didn't pay much attention, but now that you have pointed it out it looks more like a fixed carry handle gun. Will give it a proper look when I get home and try and get a proper ID. --commando552 (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
Seeems like an unchoped variant of Scott's M4, which is what an A1?, seems too long for a 723 --Iceman (talk) 14:48, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
Not sure as it is never really seen, but I think it is a different gun. I can't really tell if it has a flat top but it seems to have an A1 rear sight, which unless it is a Diemaco I think means it is a fixed carry handle gun. Also, I don't think Scott's gun is chopped, I think it is more likely the suppressor is a fake slip over one. Also, the M4, M4a1 and 723 are all the same length, which to me looks the same as this gun. I can make out a brass deflector so would guess it is an A1E1 upper like on the 723. The barrel profile of this looks like an M4 though which doesn't match the 723 (have heard late 723 had an M4 barrel but I've never seen one), but I wouldn't worry too much about the barrel profile, as I think Hire Arms might mode their guns to give their barrels an M4 profile even when they're not. For example, look at this image and compare the width of the barrel inside the front sight and ahead of it. On a real M4 they should be the same but this barrel is noticeably larger ahead of the FSB. My guess is that they fit metal sleeves over thin A1 profile barrels to give them this appearance. Regardless, I think most of the AR-15s used on the show are cobbled together mockups, so I don't think a definite ID can be determined. I'll probably call it a 723 just to call it something and make a note of the fact it has had something done to the barrel. Hopefully the same gun will turn up in a later episode where we can get a shot of it. --commando552 (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2013 (EDT)
What i don't get it is why is Stonebridge using a berretta? I doubt that was the only thing they had. --Iceman (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2013 (EDT)
Smoke Grenades
These are real smoke grenades that are used by the SA police, but I can't find a name for them. The best I can find is this website about the South African Police Special Task Force which has a very small image of it, but refers to it only as a smoke grenade. The spoon covers the writing on the body so that all I can make out is that it is an M8 something. If you zoom in on the spoon it looks like it says M8534A1, but I get no results searching for this. Does anybody know what these are? --commando552 (talk) 12:26, 18 August 2013 (EDT)
This webpage has some pictures of similar grenades: http://www.lexpev.nl/grenades/middleeastasia/southafrica/index.html It looks like the grenades used in the scene have a tapered body (like this), rather than the typical cylindrical M83. I don't know if they have a particular designation. APS221 (talk) 06:13, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
They are similar, clearly following the same pattern, but it is a different grenade. Firstly that is a red phosphorous grenade rather than a smoke one, and secondly the design is slightly different with the mystery smoke one having ports in the tapered top section of the grenade. I think the smoke one has a specific designation, as you can read that it starts as M8 something, it is just not possible to read what it is from the only photo I can find. --commando552 (talk) 06:16, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
Stonebridge's handgun during the robbery
During the start of the stock exchange robbery, when Stonebridge is handling the security guard that stumbles on them in the safety deposit box vault, he appears to be carrying a Glock and not the Beretta from S04E01. I can't get a screenshot but there are a few clear frames when he is on top of the guard right before he knocks him out and the grip of the handgun in the small of his back is clearly a Glock, possibly a Gen 2.
Got it, nice spot. It is a bit of a continuity error (not counting the fact that he has changed pistol) as it is present when they are in the bank up until the point when they leave the door, and then it seems to disappear for the firefight outside. --commando552 (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2013 (EDT)
Perhaps he puts it in the bag when he puts his vest on or somewhere in a vest pocket and they did return to their mobile base perhaps he picked it up there. Or the simplest explanation the armorer realised theres no reason he would have a berretta or the glock became available again. --Iceman (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
I just rewatched it, and he has it in the small of his back after he puts his vest on and they are preparing to leave, but in the next shot with them walking through the lobby it is gone. It stays absent for the firefight, before reappearing when they commandeer the car and is still there at the safe house. My guess is that it disappears for this scene due to it being a liability considering the stunts he was doing in that shootout (getting thrown back onto the table when shot, crawling across the floor on his back while covering Scott, stuff like that). Also, in one shot it looks like he is wearing a pad or protector under his shirt on his lower back in this scene *for the getting shot stunt) which would interfere with the gun. I saw a behind the scenes thing about this shootout and the way they tend to film these scenes is to choreograph it with multiple cameras and do long takes that cover the whole of the action, so if the gun needed to be missing for one stunt it would be missing for most of the scene. --commando552 (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2013 (EDT)
