Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
User talk:Glock172: Difference between revisions
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The description is deliberately vague to avoid needless spoilers. While fighting Makarov at the end is about as big a surprise as Mario fighting Bowser, it isn't really obvious from the image that the body is Soap (I deliberately didn't look at Soap so his name wouldn't appear and stood so you couldn't see anything distinctive) and I don't think it's really necessary to say it is. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:29, 20 November 2011 (CST) | The description is deliberately vague to avoid needless spoilers. While fighting Makarov at the end is about as big a surprise as Mario fighting Bowser, it isn't really obvious from the image that the body is Soap (I deliberately didn't look at Soap so his name wouldn't appear and stood so you couldn't see anything distinctive) and I don't think it's really necessary to say it is. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 20:29, 20 November 2011 (CST) | ||
== Southland == | == Southland == |
Revision as of 03:41, 3 March 2013
Eagle Eye
The description of how Jerry uses the Glock in the film was left purposely vague to not provide spoilers. --Ben41 20:43, 8 July 2011 (CDT)
- Oh, I'm sorry. I'll fix that if it hasn't been already. My bad.
Bill Cosby
Cosby used a lot of weapons on the I Spy (TV Series). --Ben41 22:31, 9 October 2011 (CDT)
MW3 M1911
The description is deliberately vague to avoid needless spoilers. While fighting Makarov at the end is about as big a surprise as Mario fighting Bowser, it isn't really obvious from the image that the body is Soap (I deliberately didn't look at Soap so his name wouldn't appear and stood so you couldn't see anything distinctive) and I don't think it's really necessary to say it is. Evil Tim 20:29, 20 November 2011 (CST)
Southland
Thanks for your contributions to the Southland pages. In the future, please keep your captions a little shorter. The main point of the caption is to describe the weapon seen. There is no need to over explain every single plot point that pertains to the screenshot. --Ben41 (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2013 (EST)
- Over-explaining won't happen again, but what's wrong with describing the context? People might do well to know *some* details if they see a screenshot of a cop laying on the ground firing his weapon. I won't spoil anything or over-explain, but is the policy to describe *nothing* but the weapon? Glock172 (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2013 (EST)