| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Taurus PT92: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Which is more reliable? --[[User:Taurus96|Taurus96]] 04:24, 3 March 2012 (CST) | Which is more reliable? --[[User:Taurus96|Taurus96]] 04:24, 3 March 2012 (CST) | ||
:I owned a PT92, and it was quite reliable. I do like the feel of Berettas better; they look and feel better put-together | :I owned a PT92, and it was quite reliable. I do like the feel of Berettas better; they look and feel better put-together. But I also prefer the frame-mounted safety to the Beretta's slide mounted safety (it's easier to reach with my thumb). -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008|talk]]) 17:56, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 27 October 2012
Additional Variants
PT99 pics
I will be photographing PT99s (older versions) soon. Though the PT99s with rails are commonly on sale now, they are rare in films because they are so new. With time they will probably show up more, that is unless the anti gun legislation doesn't outlaw all movie armorers.... MoviePropMaster2008 19:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wouldn't bother with photographing rail-frame PT92s or 99s; best to do the older model guns since those are still what appear in films. -MT2008
Beretta or Taurus?
Which is more reliable? --Taurus96 04:24, 3 March 2012 (CST)