Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Eye of the Beholder: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Beretta 92 == It seems to me that this is Taurus PT92: the safety is mounted on frame, not on slide as in Beretta 92FS. ~~~~") |
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Beretta 92 == | == Beretta 92 == | ||
It seems to me that this is [[Taurus PT92]]: the safety is mounted on frame, not on slide as in [[Beretta 92FS]]. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 04:47, 10 September 2012 (EDT) | It seems to me that this is [[Taurus PT92]]: the safety is mounted on frame, not on slide as in [[Beretta 92FS]]. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 04:47, 10 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I don't think it has a frame safety either. Also there is no visible hammer, so I would guess that either this is a replica with some parts missing, or if it is actually shown firing it might be a Beretta 92D:[[File:Beretta-92D.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Beretta 92D, double action only variant of the 92FS - 9x19mm]]--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 09:42, 10 September 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 13:42, 10 September 2012
Beretta 92
It seems to me that this is Taurus PT92: the safety is mounted on frame, not on slide as in Beretta 92FS. Greg-Z (talk) 04:47, 10 September 2012 (EDT)
- I don't think it has a frame safety either. Also there is no visible hammer, so I would guess that either this is a replica with some parts missing, or if it is actually shown firing it might be a Beretta 92D:--commando552 (talk) 09:42, 10 September 2012 (EDT)