| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
User talk:MoviePropMaster2008 (Archive): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:What I meant was that ''Violent Shit'' and ''Zombie '90'' were feature length films NOT made by the kid and otherwise eligible. (How a ten year old got his hands on them and how his parents allowed him to watch them is beyond me.) --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 12:35, 19 August 2012 (CDT) | :What I meant was that ''Violent Shit'' and ''Zombie '90'' were feature length films NOT made by the kid and otherwise eligible. (How a ten year old got his hands on them and how his parents allowed him to watch them is beyond me.) --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 12:35, 19 August 2012 (CDT) | ||
::The name is ''For Hire''. Here's the link to the [http://forhire.wikia.com/wiki/For_Hire_Wiki wiki]. (Yes, it has its own wiki.) The kid on kid violence is [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gtxl6lsg4gM disturbing]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 15:29, 20 August 2012 (CDT) | ::The name is ''For Hire''. Here's the link to the [http://forhire.wikia.com/wiki/For_Hire_Wiki wiki]. (Yes, it has its own wiki.) The kid on kid violence is [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gtxl6lsg4gM disturbing]. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 15:29, 20 August 2012 (CDT) | ||
== Smith & Wesson 659 == | |||
Hello. It has been awhile. I got that info about the trigger guard from the ''Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson; 3rd Edition'' by Jim Supica and Richard Nahas, page 293. I also own the 2nd Edition and I just checked it as well. Says the same thing. I and others helped Mr. Nahas (last time I checked he was the curator for the NRA's museum in Virgina now) when he was putting together the 3rd Edition over on the http://smith-wessonforum.com with adding additional info, correcting mistakes and so on. Hell he thanks everybody to include me (Checkman). So I guess I'm taking it as an article of faith that it must be correct since it wasn't changed. However mistakes do happen and sometimes those mistakes get through the cracks and eventually become accepted as correct when they aren't. Hope that helps.--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] ([[User talk:Jcordell|talk]]) 10:41, 9 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:41, 9 September 2012
Ten year olds
I think it was Bulgarian kids, and it actually had it's own wiki, which threw me off. For a while, it seemed like he was improving, so I was willing to give him a little rope. He stopped trying to submit his own movie, and Violent Shit and Zombie Panic '90 were actually real feature-length films. I told him that people were unlikely to help him finish pages on grade-Z German horror films, so he moved on to mainstream features. I'm guessing this kid didn't hear "no" a lot from his folks. I wish we could impose an age limit as well, but I don't know how we could possibly enforce it. --Funkychinaman 10:38, 19 August 2012 (CDT)
- What I meant was that Violent Shit and Zombie '90 were feature length films NOT made by the kid and otherwise eligible. (How a ten year old got his hands on them and how his parents allowed him to watch them is beyond me.) --Funkychinaman 12:35, 19 August 2012 (CDT)
- The name is For Hire. Here's the link to the wiki. (Yes, it has its own wiki.) The kid on kid violence is disturbing. --Funkychinaman 15:29, 20 August 2012 (CDT)
Smith & Wesson 659
Hello. It has been awhile. I got that info about the trigger guard from the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson; 3rd Edition by Jim Supica and Richard Nahas, page 293. I also own the 2nd Edition and I just checked it as well. Says the same thing. I and others helped Mr. Nahas (last time I checked he was the curator for the NRA's museum in Virgina now) when he was putting together the 3rd Edition over on the http://smith-wessonforum.com with adding additional info, correcting mistakes and so on. Hell he thanks everybody to include me (Checkman). So I guess I'm taking it as an article of faith that it must be correct since it wasn't changed. However mistakes do happen and sometimes those mistakes get through the cracks and eventually become accepted as correct when they aren't. Hope that helps.--Jcordell (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2012 (EDT)