| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Hotel Rwanda: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Slemke1998 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT) | If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT) | ||
:I know this is old so I'm not expecting a response but I believe that whoever made that thinks that the 92 actually came out in 1992, hence the comment about 1994. In reality the 92 was borderline obsolete by 94. --[[User:Slemke1998|Slemke1998]] ([[User talk:Slemke1998|talk]]) 01:43, 26 July 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:43, 26 July 2019
Unknowns
[moved from main page] --AdAstra2009 02:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC) Guns I can't even guess the make and model of.
it looks slightly like a High standard M10 but the barrel is to long and it has a stock both features a non-existent on all the models of this gun that I've ever seen.
- This one with the Beta-C drum looks like some kind of M16 variant. You can see the fore end of the weapon in that familiar tube and the rear sights. Excalibur01 00:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Could it be an FNC? That would be standard issue.-RedJedRevolver 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).SAWGunner89 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Beretta 92FS
It could be a Centurion --AdAstra2009 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- No, it's too long to be a Centurion, it's a regular 92FS. - Mr. Wolf 19:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)
MG3
It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page
Beretta 92 Section
If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --Rebusdi 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)
- I know this is old so I'm not expecting a response but I believe that whoever made that thinks that the 92 actually came out in 1992, hence the comment about 1994. In reality the 92 was borderline obsolete by 94. --Slemke1998 (talk) 01:43, 26 July 2019 (EDT)