| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Gribeauval 12-Pounder Cannon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
But it was used in the direct fire role, to shoot columns, which qualifies it. [[User:Sangheili1155|Sangheili1155]] 06:09, 8 June 2012 (CDT) | But it was used in the direct fire role, to shoot columns, which qualifies it. [[User:Sangheili1155|Sangheili1155]] 06:09, 8 June 2012 (CDT) | ||
:Every field gun can be used for direct fire. There is no tactical difference between Napoleonic 12-pounder and WW1 French 75. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] 06:37, 8 June 2012 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:37, 8 June 2012
Does it qualify?
This is field artillery piece. Does it qualify? If yes - then there is a lot of similar weapons in lot of other movies and they must have their pages also. Greg-Z 00:18, 8 June 2012 (CDT)
"What we do not allow are weapons which are too large to be operated by either an individual or small crew or are used primarily as indirect fire delivery systems. This disqualifies fuel air bombs, all air dropped bombs, mortars, artillery, IEDs, most explosive ordnance." --Zackmann08 00:23, 8 June 2012 (CDT)
Yes, it´s right - 15 crews, 6 horses :) Sorry ...--Pandolfini 01:54, 8 June 2012 (CDT)
But it was used in the direct fire role, to shoot columns, which qualifies it. Sangheili1155 06:09, 8 June 2012 (CDT)
- Every field gun can be used for direct fire. There is no tactical difference between Napoleonic 12-pounder and WW1 French 75. Greg-Z 06:37, 8 June 2012 (CDT)