Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Savages: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:


:::This was my first time creating a page. How did I do? --[[User:Plumtree23|Plumtree23]]
:::This was my first time creating a page. How did I do? --[[User:Plumtree23|Plumtree23]]
::::The overall format was good, I had to make a few changes to the page, but nothing major, so not too bad for a first page, better than a lot of other first pages I have seen. --[[User:SmithandWesson36|SmithandWesson36]] 22:53, 29 April 2012 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:53, 30 April 2012

Remington 870

Just because it is said to be a Remington 870 in the book does not mean it will be an 870 in the movie. Movies miss details from the books they are based off all the time. For example in No Country for Old Men, Llewelyn's rifle is described as a Mauser rifle, but in the movie adaptation Llewelyn uses a Remington 700. --SmithandWesson36 12:08, 29 April 2012 (CDT)

Just about to post the same thing. So it does not mean that the shotgun is actually a 870, we will see when the movie comes out. In the meantime should we just call it unknown shotgun? Also about the M1911, just because of the beavertail and hammer, it doesn't necessarily mean that it's a Kimber either, it's not that hard to get a M1911 modified with those parts. Bristow8411 12:47, 29 April 2012 (CDT)

Yeah, I agree they should be listed as unknown shotgun and unknown 1911 variant right now until we can get better shots of both guns. --SmithandWesson36 13:00, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
Also, Ben's pistol looks like a Heckler & Koch HK45C, so I'm going to list it as such. --SmithandWesson36 13:04, 29 April 2012 (CDT)
This was my first time creating a page. How did I do? --Plumtree23
The overall format was good, I had to make a few changes to the page, but nothing major, so not too bad for a first page, better than a lot of other first pages I have seen. --SmithandWesson36 22:53, 29 April 2012 (CDT)