Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Black Dynamite: Difference between revisions
(→S&W 629?: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Image:BD_question_01.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Both of his pistols are supposed to be .44 Magnums, but compare the bore of the cylinders of the revolver in his right hand to the one in his left.]] | [[Image:BD_question_01.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Both of his pistols are supposed to be .44 Magnums, but compare the bore of the cylinders of the revolver in his right hand to the one in his left.]] | ||
== Unknown pistols == | |||
[[Image:BD_unknown_01.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Rafelli's goons gun down Black Dynamite's brother, Jimmy.]] |
Revision as of 11:26, 23 October 2011
686
WOOHOO!-S&Wshooter 03:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Order
Aren't the pictures supposed to go below the accompanying description? This arcticle currently reverses that order.
Description
I'd like to compliment whoever wrote the background description for this page. It provides interesting insight on the film's purpose and unique "retro" development and is very well done. On a different note the screen caps on the page are 400px rather than the standard 600px. If no one minds, I'm going to fix this. -Anonymous
- Thank you, and thank you. --funkychinaman 17:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
S&W 629?
A while ago, a user raised the possibility that BD didn't actually use a S&W 629, and perhaps it was a S&W 686 instead. As I was capping the film, I noticed something weird. See below. Any ideas? --Funkychinaman 06:24, 23 October 2011 (CDT)