| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
User talk:Benny Frandsen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I'm not sure what you mean by editorial attendance, but it's preferable that the page makers to try and make a good effort first at identifying the weapons, or else the admins would be spending all day modifying a whole bunch of pages made with loads of unidentified weapons. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] 19:55, 12 August 2011 (CDT) | I'm not sure what you mean by editorial attendance, but it's preferable that the page makers to try and make a good effort first at identifying the weapons, or else the admins would be spending all day modifying a whole bunch of pages made with loads of unidentified weapons. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] 19:55, 12 August 2011 (CDT) | ||
:Well, I just mean that, like in Wikipedia or the IMCDB, any visitor could come across an unidentified weapon in an article and say "Hmm, that one's unidentified, but I just recognize it. So let me just edit this article or write something about it on the discussion page." Regarding the IMFDB I think that it simply lacks that many people view the specific pages with unidentified weapons on them. Additionally, IMFDB currently has not that many templates, which could indicate articles missing specific information etc (like e.g. an "unidentified weapons" template). Anyway, of course I will try to do better in the future.-- [[User:Benny Frandsen|Benny Frandsen]] 06:14, 13 August 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:14, 13 August 2011
Making Pages
Your page for Lisztomania has too many unidentified weapons on it. In the future, please try to make a bigger effort to identify the weapons before making a page and place any further unidentified weapons in the discussion page. Also, please make your screenshots are Safe for Work (in other words, no nudity or needlessly graphic shots). Please review the Rules, Standards and Principles page prior to future revisions.
- Hi, thanks for the remarks. I'm rather new here, so I do not yet know about the usual treatment of articles with unidentified weapons. I supposed that some users with a sharp eye and considerable knowledge on 19th century rifles could quickly identify the rifles, but apparently this website lacks the editorial attendance, compared to similar projects such as the Internet Movie Cars Database, or so. I'll keep this in mind for future articles. Regarding the Safe for Work thing: It's your website and I will not complain if you delete or edit problematic images. I'm glad you already did so with the mentioned shots. Kind greetings!-- Benny Frandsen 17:05, 11 August 2011 (CDT)
I'm not sure what you mean by editorial attendance, but it's preferable that the page makers to try and make a good effort first at identifying the weapons, or else the admins would be spending all day modifying a whole bunch of pages made with loads of unidentified weapons. --Ben41 19:55, 12 August 2011 (CDT)
- Well, I just mean that, like in Wikipedia or the IMCDB, any visitor could come across an unidentified weapon in an article and say "Hmm, that one's unidentified, but I just recognize it. So let me just edit this article or write something about it on the discussion page." Regarding the IMFDB I think that it simply lacks that many people view the specific pages with unidentified weapons on them. Additionally, IMFDB currently has not that many templates, which could indicate articles missing specific information etc (like e.g. an "unidentified weapons" template). Anyway, of course I will try to do better in the future.-- Benny Frandsen 06:14, 13 August 2011 (CDT)