| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:De Lisle Carbine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I just switched it to carbine. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 18:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT) | :I just switched it to carbine. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 18:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT) | ||
::Damn you I was going to do that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 18:43, 15 July 2011 (CDT) | ::Damn you I was going to do that. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 18:43, 15 July 2011 (CDT) | ||
Also switched the specs from metric to Imperial, since, let's face it, this was a weapon made in inches and pounds, not millimetres and kilos. Or the grand old days when England still used it's own measuring system. >:( [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 18:53, 15 July 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:53, 15 July 2011
Petition to remove from "SMG" category
This weapon clearly does NOT fit the definition of a sub-machine gun. --HashiriyaR32 18:07, 15 July 2011 (CDT)
- I just switched it to carbine. --Funkychinaman 18:35, 15 July 2011 (CDT)
- Damn you I was going to do that. Evil Tim 18:43, 15 July 2011 (CDT)
Also switched the specs from metric to Imperial, since, let's face it, this was a weapon made in inches and pounds, not millimetres and kilos. Or the grand old days when England still used it's own measuring system. >:( Evil Tim 18:53, 15 July 2011 (CDT)