Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Heckler & Koch HK33: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) (HK33SG/1) |
Orca1 9904 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is there a reason we don't have a section for this rifle, but do for the G3SG/1? Granted, the chances of a genuine 33SG/1 appearing are pretty slim, but as far as I can tell all of the G3SG/1s listed are mock ups. If we keep to the same logic as the G3 page, the guns with integral bi-pods and scopes should be labelled as SG/1s. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:40, 14 April 2011 (CDT) | Is there a reason we don't have a section for this rifle, but do for the G3SG/1? Granted, the chances of a genuine 33SG/1 appearing are pretty slim, but as far as I can tell all of the G3SG/1s listed are mock ups. If we keep to the same logic as the G3 page, the guns with integral bi-pods and scopes should be labelled as SG/1s. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 17:40, 14 April 2011 (CDT) | ||
:If you can find an instance where this weapon has appeared, feel free to make a section for it on the page. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] 17:57, 14 April 2011 (CDT) |
Revision as of 22:57, 14 April 2011
HK33SG/1
Is there a reason we don't have a section for this rifle, but do for the G3SG/1? Granted, the chances of a genuine 33SG/1 appearing are pretty slim, but as far as I can tell all of the G3SG/1s listed are mock ups. If we keep to the same logic as the G3 page, the guns with integral bi-pods and scopes should be labelled as SG/1s. --commando552 17:40, 14 April 2011 (CDT)
- If you can find an instance where this weapon has appeared, feel free to make a section for it on the page. Orca1 9904 17:57, 14 April 2011 (CDT)