| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Flag: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PistolJunkie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
IMO, the first in-scene picture of M16 Rifle's section should be AR-18 (judging from butt shape and rear sight). | IMO, the first in-scene picture of M16 Rifle's section should be AR-18 (judging from butt shape and rear sight). | ||
:The receiver is that of an AR-15/M16, not an AR-18. Also, sign your posts.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 14:21, 26 March 2011 (CDT) | :The receiver is that of an AR-15/M16, not an AR-18. Also, sign your posts.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 14:21, 26 March 2011 (CDT) | ||
From the shot of the crewmen next to it, that looks more like an M61 on the VTOL than an M134. [[User:Vangelis2|Vangelis2]] 06:54, 5 April 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:54, 5 April 2011
IMO, the first in-scene picture of M16 Rifle's section should be AR-18 (judging from butt shape and rear sight).
- The receiver is that of an AR-15/M16, not an AR-18. Also, sign your posts.--PistolJunkie 14:21, 26 March 2011 (CDT)
From the shot of the crewmen next to it, that looks more like an M61 on the VTOL than an M134. Vangelis2 06:54, 5 April 2011 (CDT)