| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Kimel AP-9: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is the Kimel AP-9 better than the Intratec TEC-9? --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 03:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | Is the Kimel AP-9 better than the Intratec TEC-9? --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 03:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:It has a finer fit and finish than the TEC-9 and it feels more refined, less clunky than the action of the TEC-9. It takes the same magazines and the SAFETY is light years better than the TEC-9. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | :It has a finer fit and finish than the TEC-9 and it feels more refined, less clunky than the action of the TEC-9. It takes the same magazines and the SAFETY is light years better than the TEC-9. [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 06:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Wow... well, here's something else I was curious about, what kind of combat scenario is the AP-9 good for? --[[User:ThatoneguyJosh|ThatoneguyJosh]] 06:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:57, 19 January 2011
Question
Is the Kimel AP-9 better than the Intratec TEC-9? --ThatoneguyJosh 03:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- It has a finer fit and finish than the TEC-9 and it feels more refined, less clunky than the action of the TEC-9. It takes the same magazines and the SAFETY is light years better than the TEC-9. MoviePropMaster2008 06:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wow... well, here's something else I was curious about, what kind of combat scenario is the AP-9 good for? --ThatoneguyJosh 06:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)