| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 686: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PistolJunkie (talk | contribs) |
FIVETWOSEVEN (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Usually. It did matter in [[Blood Work]], though.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 23:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC) | Usually. It did matter in [[Blood Work]], though.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 23:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
One movie < most movies. Also I highly doubt that most would notice UNLESS a point is specifically made about it in the movie.--[[User:FIVETWOSEVEN|FIVETWOSEVEN]] 21:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:31, 11 January 2011
Additional Variants
underused
- It's a shame that this exquisite example of Smith and Wesson's handywork is so underused in movies and games-S&Wshooter 17:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I guess their interest is mostly in either the bigger-caliber large-frames or the smaller 'pocket' revolvers like the Model 36. Orca1 9904 18:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I know, but the +P model holds 7 shots! How is that not interesting? "Did I shoot 5 shots 0r 6? Oh wait I have 7! *BLAM*
One of the side arms used by Raptor Pilots in the new Battlestar Galactica series was a modified S&W 686.
Capacity means nothing in a movie.--FIVETWOSEVEN 19:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Usually. It did matter in Blood Work, though.--PistolJunkie 23:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
One movie < most movies. Also I highly doubt that most would notice UNLESS a point is specifically made about it in the movie.--FIVETWOSEVEN 21:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)