| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
User talk:PainMan356: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == Lee Enfield == You need to do a better job of showing your sources before you go and make changes like you did on the Lee Enfield page. Those photos were taken by a MPM2008. He has acce...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Lee Enfield == | == Lee Enfield == | ||
You need to do a better job of showing your sources before you go and make changes like you did on the Lee Enfield page. Those photos were taken by a MPM2008. He has access to the actual weapons. I've rolled back the changes. And I will continue to do so until I see your sources documented. Use the discussion page for that work please. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 18:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | You need to do a better job of showing your sources before you go and make changes like you did on the Lee Enfield page. Those photos were taken by a MPM2008. He has access to the actual weapons. I've rolled back the changes. And I will continue to do so until I see your sources documented. Use the discussion page for that work please. Thank you. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 18:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Hello, I am the photographer of that particular rifle and boy do I WISH it were an ultra rare SMLE No 1 MK II but it isn't. I looked up a photo of the ultra rare No 1. Mk II (Pre WW1 rifle) and the receiver is different. Mine is a plain jane (and thus not super valuable) No 1, Mk III. Don't know what made you think it was a No II but the area for the stripper clip and the rear sight are completely different on the two rifles. I also went to the rack where that rifle is and double checked (actually hoping that I had the vastly more valuable No 1 Mk II, but that isn't the case.)[[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 20:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:32, 15 December 2010
Lee Enfield
You need to do a better job of showing your sources before you go and make changes like you did on the Lee Enfield page. Those photos were taken by a MPM2008. He has access to the actual weapons. I've rolled back the changes. And I will continue to do so until I see your sources documented. Use the discussion page for that work please. Thank you. --Jcordell 18:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, I am the photographer of that particular rifle and boy do I WISH it were an ultra rare SMLE No 1 MK II but it isn't. I looked up a photo of the ultra rare No 1. Mk II (Pre WW1 rifle) and the receiver is different. Mine is a plain jane (and thus not super valuable) No 1, Mk III. Don't know what made you think it was a No II but the area for the stripper clip and the rear sight are completely different on the two rifles. I also went to the rack where that rifle is and double checked (actually hoping that I had the vastly more valuable No 1 Mk II, but that isn't the case.)MoviePropMaster2008 20:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC)