Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Thunderbolt and Lightfoot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PistolJunkie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That Mauser is not a M712 (no selector switch) but the barrel is too long for it to be a Bolo, which is the only other variant that the C96 page lists as having been available with a 20 round magazine. Any ideas as to which version it is? I'd rather not change it until I can actually identify the variant.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 04:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | That Mauser is not a M712 (no selector switch) but the barrel is too long for it to be a Bolo, which is the only other variant that the C96 page lists as having been available with a 20 round magazine. Any ideas as to which version it is? I'd rather not change it until I can actually identify the variant.--[[User:PistolJunkie|PistolJunkie]] 04:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: I believe there was also a semi-auto version only called the M711. It also took a detachable magazine. Possibly the one used in the movie was converted to full auto? I'll do some research. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 23:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:09, 13 December 2010
That Mauser is not a M712 (no selector switch) but the barrel is too long for it to be a Bolo, which is the only other variant that the C96 page lists as having been available with a 20 round magazine. Any ideas as to which version it is? I'd rather not change it until I can actually identify the variant.--PistolJunkie 04:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- I believe there was also a semi-auto version only called the M711. It also took a detachable magazine. Possibly the one used in the movie was converted to full auto? I'll do some research. --Jcordell 23:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)