Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Smith & Wesson Victory Model: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


== Question ==
== Question ==
Can .38 Special be used in .38 S&W chambered revolvers? --[[Special:Contributions/71.168.252.179|71.168.252.179]] 23:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Can .38 Special be used in .38 S&W chambered revolvers? --[[User:Ardtanker14|Ardtanker14]] 23:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:39, 5 December 2010

How does the .38 S&W compare to the .38 Special? I know it is less powerful but not how much less. -Anonymous

In terms of the ammo commercially available today, very poorly. The only ammo I can ever find (for my Enfield No.2s, Webley .38 Mk.IV and S&W Military & Police and Pre-Victory) is Remington 148 grain lead round nose that's loaded very light. The thing about .38 S&W is it was originally introduced in 1876 for the S&W Baby Russian, and it was used in a whole series of fairly weak and cheap pocket top break revolvers. Because of that, in the US the ammo you find is loaded light because the ammo companies are worried about it being chambered in these guns. But when the British adopted it as a service round, it was originally loaded with a 200 grain "manstopper" (basically a wadcutter) bullet, and then a 178 grain conical FMJ, both loaded to higher pressure then current ammo. I still wouldn't say it was as potent as a .38 Special, but definately better than current commercial loads. Nyles


Question

Can .38 Special be used in .38 S&W chambered revolvers? --Ardtanker14 23:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Smith_%26_Wesson_Victory_Model&oldid=363150"