| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Smith & Wesson 3900 pistol series: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 3913 moved to Talk:Smith & Wesson 3913 over redirect) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Action Question== | ==Action Question== | ||
Just to double check, even though this pistol has a recessed hammer, it is still Double/single action right? -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | Just to double check, even though this pistol has a recessed hammer, it is still Double/single action right? -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | ||
==3913NL== | |||
So...the 3913NL was made just for idots who couldn't deal with having "Ladysmith" inscribed on their gun? That's kind of pathetic. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | |||
Revision as of 23:12, 5 January 2011
Has anyone seen the serial number on the Ladysmith in the picture? "THX 1138". Lol, that's one hell of a coincidence, unless of course someone at Smith & Wesson has quite a sense of humor. -Gunman69 01:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- It's no mystery. I took that pic. I digitally removed the rest of the serial number and left the 1138 intentionally. I always removed the back half of the S/N on the guns I photography for privacy reasons. MoviePropMaster2008 08:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Action Question
Just to double check, even though this pistol has a recessed hammer, it is still Double/single action right? -Anonymous
3913NL
So...the 3913NL was made just for idots who couldn't deal with having "Ladysmith" inscribed on their gun? That's kind of pathetic. -Anonymous