Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Bergmann Pistols: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Sounds logical to me. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 04:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | :: Sounds logical to me. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 04:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Which post are you answering? Excalibur's or Mine? Considering we are proposing two radically different solutions? (and please don't answer "Yes"...... ;) [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] |
Revision as of 05:05, 23 November 2010
Neither of the entries here actually has a real Bergmann Model 1896, only mockups, so do they really count? Shouldn't they be listed as P38s if they are, in fact, actually P38s? --funkychinaman 12:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
I think this page should be deleted and the list should be moved to the P38 section as Mocked up as Bergmann Model 1896 Excalibur01 03:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- the problem is that there is VALUE in at least outlining what these guns are supposed to be. I have never seen a Bergmann in armorer inventory ever and the fact that it's uber rare and pretty expensive is probably the case. But I do find it interesting to know what these mockups are supposed to be. But that's just my two cents. I would prefer to have the page, if only to explain to the curious public that 'that Bergmann they thought they saw, was indeed NOT a real one'.... MoviePropMaster2008
- Sounds logical to me. --Jcordell 04:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Which post are you answering? Excalibur's or Mine? Considering we are proposing two radically different solutions? (and please don't answer "Yes"...... ;) MoviePropMaster2008