Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Covert Affairs: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
==No spoilers==
==No spoilers==
Ominae, you have to read the rules regarding spoilers. Don't reveal too much about the story or plot.  It is not necessary to identifying the gun.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 19:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Ominae, you have to read the rules regarding spoilers. Don't reveal too much about the story or plot.  It is not necessary to identifying the gun.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 19:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
==Realism==
I appreciate dramatic license as much as the next guy but the one overwhelming problem I have is the fact that the CIA's charter specifically forbids it from operating on U.S. soil.  And while this show is somewhat entertaining the aplomb with which the Agency operates, armed, in the US is a little much. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:31, 4 September 2010

the unknown rifle is just an m4 with an elcan specter dr scope and other accessories.


Best Title Card Thing

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
The one already there.

OR

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
The one a found on the Wiki page.

Either works, though I like the second one more. --Crazycrankle 04:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

No spoilers

Ominae, you have to read the rules regarding spoilers. Don't reveal too much about the story or plot. It is not necessary to identifying the gun. MoviePropMaster2008 19:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Realism

I appreciate dramatic license as much as the next guy but the one overwhelming problem I have is the fact that the CIA's charter specifically forbids it from operating on U.S. soil. And while this show is somewhat entertaining the aplomb with which the Agency operates, armed, in the US is a little much. --Charon68 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)