Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Stiletto: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Revolver==
I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


Line 5: Line 6:
::It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the python thought the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question.
::It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the python thought the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question.
::The contours of the ejector shroud are a bit off too, as it the shape of the hammer. (I have a GP100, so I'm always on the lookout for them.) --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
::The contours of the ejector shroud are a bit off too, as it the shape of the hammer. (I have a GP100, so I'm always on the lookout for them.) --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
:::The GP100 was my best gues at the time, but since you brought up the Smith & Wesson 686 I'm thinking that might actually be it. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]]


==Glock==
Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
:I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]]
:I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]]

Revision as of 16:15, 14 August 2010

Revolver

I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --funkychinaman 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -Anonymous

Yes, but plenty of revolvers have full length ejector shrouds. It could just as easily be a SW 686 or a Python. Mind you, I'm just basing this on this one screenshot, I haven't actually seen the movie. --funkychinaman 15:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the python thought the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question.
The contours of the ejector shroud are a bit off too, as it the shape of the hammer. (I have a GP100, so I'm always on the lookout for them.) --funkychinaman 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The GP100 was my best gues at the time, but since you brought up the Smith & Wesson 686 I'm thinking that might actually be it. -Anonymous


Glock

Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --Crazycrankle 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -Anonymous
Retrieved from "https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Stiletto&oldid=313712"