| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Hotel Rwanda: Difference between revisions
(→MG3: new section) |
(→Beretta 92 Section: new section) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page | It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page | ||
== Beretta 92 Section == | |||
If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --[[User:Rebusdi|Rebusdi]] 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:57, 23 October 2011
Unknowns
[moved from main page] --AdAstra2009 02:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC) Guns I can't even guess the make and model of.
it looks slightly like a High standard M10 but the barrel is to long and it has a stock both features a non-existent on all the models of this gun that I've ever seen.
- This one with the Beta-C drum looks like some kind of M16 variant. You can see the fore end of the weapon in that familiar tube and the rear sights. Excalibur01 00:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Could it be an FNC? That would be standard issue.-RedJedRevolver 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Is that a carrying handle on it? If so, then it could not be an FNC, and it is not very likely that it is an M16 variant with a carrying handle (the forward stock does not match the Colt LMG).SAWGunner89 20:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Beretta 92FS
It could be a Centurion --AdAstra2009 07:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
MG3
It was not manufactured by HK, as said on this page
Beretta 92 Section
If anyone else agrees, I think this section needs to be cleaned up. I am some what confused by the statement that it is 'only 1994', as to what was the original author's intent. It read a bit clunky and too much apocrypha. Thoughts? --Rebusdi 18:57, 23 October 2011 (CDT)