Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:QBZ-95: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(→QBZ-03) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Are we going to add the QBZ-03? Same caliber, but it uses a conventional rifle layout based on the Type 81. I think it was in AO2:TFD. | Are we going to add the QBZ-03? Same caliber, but it uses a conventional rifle layout based on the Type 81. I think it was in AO2:TFD. | ||
:If everyone agrees with this, I will add the [[QBZ-03]] to this page.--[[User:SB2296|SB2296]] 07:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC) | :If everyone agrees with this, I will add the [[Norinco QBZ-03]] to this page.--[[User:SB2296|SB2296]] 07:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:46, 26 January 2010
changes
Keep the QBZ-97 carbine as the QBZ-95 carbine because 95 designation means the chinese 5.8x42mm round while the 97 designation refers to the export models which are chambered in 5.56x45 mm NATO and uses M16/AR15 STANAG magazines.
The carbine version of the QBZ-95 is the CAR-95, see: http://www.securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/1700/1719.htm
- I remember hearing somewhere that the 5.8 round performs very poorly-S&Wshooter 03:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
QBZ-03
Are we going to add the QBZ-03? Same caliber, but it uses a conventional rifle layout based on the Type 81. I think it was in AO2:TFD.
- If everyone agrees with this, I will add the Norinco QBZ-03 to this page.--SB2296 07:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)