| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Hurt Locker: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:I'm sorry, I can't remember where the movie specifies when it takes place.-protoAuthor | :I'm sorry, I can't remember where the movie specifies when it takes place.-protoAuthor | ||
::* Definately right about the military screwing up, or sometimes new kit taking longer to get in service. I worked with US troops in 2007 that were still using mixed camoflage and ALICE gear. Out of a whole battalion I think like 5 guys had all the new stuff. - Nyles | ::* Definately right about the military screwing up, or sometimes new kit taking longer to get in service. I worked with US troops in 2007 that were still using mixed camoflage and ALICE gear. Out of a whole battalion I think like 5 guys had all the new stuff. Hell, sometimes it depends on what base you get issued your kit at. I got my tans in Winnipeg and got the old desert boots, everyone who kitted in Edmonton got the new ones. - Nyles | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 21 September 2009
M4A1 pics
Aren't some of the M4A1 pics a little uneccesary. Like five of the publicity stills barely show guns and the ones with stamps on the lower right look like crap. I vote to have them removed. - Gunmaster45
- Well, if you won't do it, I will.-protoAuthor
The helmat covers
I know the military seems awesome and all, but they screw up sometimes too. They dont always issue the right shit, like the Marines in Generation Kill were issued the wrong camo for desert operations. Especially helmet covers. They are realllllly bad on those. So it doesnt designate that hes EOD, its just shows that the Army screws up -The Winchester
- Except that the Marines in the 2003 were issued woodland camo because the USMC already were replacing the desert camo and the woodland camo with MARPAT. Hence that Iceman was wearing MARPAT and so were the officers. The Army replaced the Desert Camo and the Woodland camo in 2005 so it's unlikely that in 2007 (the year the movie takes place) there would be still camouflage needed replacing. It's most likely that the Prop Department didn't have enough UCP helmet covers. The Prop Department also screwed up by giving a lot of soldiers PASGT helmets. By 2007 the MICH TC-2000 Combat Helmet had completely replaced the PASGT helmet.-Oliveira 14:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- The woodland cover is probably just a stylistic choice on the part of the director to make Sergeant James more distinctive from the other members of the team and to enhance his "outsider" status. As for the PASGT helmets, The Hurt Locker is an indie film that was produced on a limited budget by most action movie standards, so it is far cheaper just to outfit everyone in the background with the existing PASGT helmets rather than to purchase genuine or replica MICH helmets. Markit
- I agree. Makes more sense.-Oliveira 01:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I can't remember where the movie specifies when it takes place.-protoAuthor
- Definately right about the military screwing up, or sometimes new kit taking longer to get in service. I worked with US troops in 2007 that were still using mixed camoflage and ALICE gear. Out of a whole battalion I think like 5 guys had all the new stuff. Hell, sometimes it depends on what base you get issued your kit at. I got my tans in Winnipeg and got the old desert boots, everyone who kitted in Edmonton got the new ones. - Nyles