| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Evans Repeating Rifle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gunmaster45 (talk | contribs) (New page: Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]] | ||
You have to wonder how expensive the ammo was since it was made for that rifle alone. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:37, 19 September 2009
Yeah, this gun looks horrible. I could never see John Wayne or Clint Eastwood using one of these things and not looking like a complete fool. But 34 rounds is a lot of firepower in a rifle of the era... unless it inevitabley jammed. - Gunmaster45
You have to wonder how expensive the ammo was since it was made for that rifle alone. --Jcordell 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)