| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day: Difference between revisions
(→I recently: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== I recently == | == I recently == | ||
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?) | watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]]-[[User:Shooter|Shooter]] | ||
Revision as of 23:52, 16 September 2009
For those who haven't seen it yet, the movie's recently-released trailer (which is the source of our page's info) is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if2-PYxgL50
Looks like it'll follow completely in the vein of its predecessor - totally mindless and full of self-inflated importance, but impossible not to enjoy. Only thing that bothers me is that Sean Patrick Flannery has really not aged too well - dude's got an obvious double-chin in the trailer. That, and the fact that I would have preferred to see them using FN Five-Sevens instead of Desert Eagles. -MT2008 13:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Just watched the trailer. Looks great!!!
It does look awesome. Norman Reedus on the other hand doesn't look like he has aged more than a year or too. I hope it will be better than the first, but it won't be the same with out Willem Dafoe -Mythekal
I recently
watched the trailer and there's a scene where Billy Connely and a thug face off and the thug is holding a revolver (Ruger Blackhawk maybe?)-Shooter-Shooter