Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Enlisted: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Line 13: Line 13:
Hello. Can a weapon like the FG42 / II (ZF4 Scope) be considered a sniper rifle?--[[User:Mateogala|Emto_PL]] ([[User talk:Mateogala|talk]]) 06:21, 30 March 2022 (EDT)
Hello. Can a weapon like the FG42 / II (ZF4 Scope) be considered a sniper rifle?--[[User:Mateogala|Emto_PL]] ([[User talk:Mateogala|talk]]) 06:21, 30 March 2022 (EDT)
:Not really - it wasn't formally considered a sniper rifle, and doesn't exactly have the accuracy to be one either. To be honest, the entire sniper rifle section here is largely unnecessary - most "sniper rifles" of the WWII era were simply existing bolt-action and semi-automatic infantry rifles fitted with scopes, so you're essentially making a whole separate section on the page for the exact same guns with an added attachment. You could just merge the sniper variants into their unscoped counterparts' sections and it would be fine. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 06:33, 30 March 2022 (EDT)
:Not really - it wasn't formally considered a sniper rifle, and doesn't exactly have the accuracy to be one either. To be honest, the entire sniper rifle section here is largely unnecessary - most "sniper rifles" of the WWII era were simply existing bolt-action and semi-automatic infantry rifles fitted with scopes, so you're essentially making a whole separate section on the page for the exact same guns with an added attachment. You could just merge the sniper variants into their unscoped counterparts' sections and it would be fine. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 06:33, 30 March 2022 (EDT)
::This is what I was thinking about connecting these sections, because apart from the scopes, they do not differ in any way. As for the "Barrett M82A1M" gun. Treat it as a sniper rifle or put it in the "Anti Material rifles" section.--[[User:Mateogala|Emto_PL]] ([[User talk:Mateogala|talk]]) 06:44, 30 March 2022 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:44, 30 March 2022

Unidentified weapon

Cannon # 01

I found something like that in the Normandy campaign. Is it a cannon?--Emto_PL (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2021 (EST)

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
I guess it's a rangefinder. Something like this one. --Greg-Z (talk) 07:12, 7 November 2021 (EST)
Here is the particular model. --Nanomat (talk) 11:23, 7 November 2021 (EST)

Mine

What is this model of a mine? Found on a beach in normandy. --Emto_PL (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2021 (EST)

Error creating thumbnail: File missing

FG42/II / Sniper rifle ?

Hello. Can a weapon like the FG42 / II (ZF4 Scope) be considered a sniper rifle?--Emto_PL (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2022 (EDT)

Not really - it wasn't formally considered a sniper rifle, and doesn't exactly have the accuracy to be one either. To be honest, the entire sniper rifle section here is largely unnecessary - most "sniper rifles" of the WWII era were simply existing bolt-action and semi-automatic infantry rifles fitted with scopes, so you're essentially making a whole separate section on the page for the exact same guns with an added attachment. You could just merge the sniper variants into their unscoped counterparts' sections and it would be fine. Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2022 (EDT)
This is what I was thinking about connecting these sections, because apart from the scopes, they do not differ in any way. As for the "Barrett M82A1M" gun. Treat it as a sniper rifle or put it in the "Anti Material rifles" section.--Emto_PL (talk) 06:44, 30 March 2022 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Enlisted&oldid=1493407"