| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Vampire Sex Diaries: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Image:Krssnngok 13.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | [[Image:Krssnngok 13.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
[[Image:Krssnngok 14.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | [[Image:Krssnngok 14.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
As far as I see, none of these two. The frame is more in S&W style, less sloped than on Colts. The barrel is thick but slightly tapered at its base. And the cylinder has very short grooves, only about a half of the length of the cylinder itself which is not common for real guns, that's why I think about blank-firing replica. Sorry, I cannot propose any idea, need more knowing expert than me.--[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 10:37, 10 January 2022 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:37, 10 January 2022
The revolver has unsupported extractor rod that is best seen on the fourth screenshot. The grooves on the cylinder are shorter and more shallow than on S&W 10. Maybe the revolver is some kind of replica gun that not follows the base gun in all details. Or it's some different revolver that I don't know. Anyway, there are differences from Model 10. --Greg-Z (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2022 (EST)
- Maybe Colt M1917 Revolver or Smith & Wesson Model of 1899 M&P? Pyramid Silent (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2022 (EST)
As far as I see, none of these two. The frame is more in S&W style, less sloped than on Colts. The barrel is thick but slightly tapered at its base. And the cylinder has very short grooves, only about a half of the length of the cylinder itself which is not common for real guns, that's why I think about blank-firing replica. Sorry, I cannot propose any idea, need more knowing expert than me.--Greg-Z (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2022 (EST)